Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Possessions (film 2009)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 05:45, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Possessions (film 2009)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No RS, just an IMDB link. M ask?  10:24, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Second link added, a user editable film directory akin to IMDB, as which displays a poster from an earlier film. I suspect hoax. -- M  ask?  10:51, 6 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:NFF. The Weak Willed 11:06, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, no evidence of reliable-source coverage to demonstrate notability. ~ mazca  talk 11:39, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —PC78 (talk) 11:49, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Strongly protest against deletion, the article I believe has credibility. Since I am also a member of the Wikipedia:Films, I can make out what is a hoax and whats not. The actor seems to be genuine and the film seems to be authentic. It would unfair on our part to delete the article. Nefirious (talk) 18:26, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no reliable sources to indicate this is notable. Tony Fox (arf!) 19:19, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice and allow back when it gets more press. Film is not a hoax, as it has been covered by Hollywood Reporter and Cinematical, but it needs a bit more to meet notability guidelines. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 23:27, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Strongly insist on this being deleted, delete it and once it rises up to the GNG then recreate. Meeting verifiability and meeting notability are two different standards, it may not be a hoax but it isn't notable, yet. Darrenhusted (talk) 22:44, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.