Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post-dubstep


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Relevant sources have been proposed and not refuted.  Sandstein  06:35, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Post-dubstep

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not enough references to support the existence of the genre/notability of the genre. One reference sources the term but I don't think it is enough to make the genre notable. The other reference just simply links to an artist page on BBC.  Esa nchez (Talk 2 me or Sign here) 01:30, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 26 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge with dubstep. ℥nding · start 14:56, 27 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep another reference here: http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/13731-maybes-ep-sketch-on-glass-ep/ It seems to be gaining notability, and a lot of the artists under 'post-dubstep' don't fit into the general image of dubstep, and so - while its a stupid term - post dubstep does seem pertinent. 220.239.169.62 (talk) 03:48, 30 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep there does seem to be some in-depth coverage out there in reliable sources, in particular this and this and also some briefer mentions Siawase (talk) 10:52, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.