Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post-gay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedily deleted by Mushroom per CSD G12 (copyvio). Non-admin closure. Deor 01:41, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Post-gay

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is written badly, not to mention this term is not widely used to meet notability. Skywolf talk/contribs 21:05, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete seems like recentivism until reliable sources using this exact term in this exact frame of reference turn up(couldn't post-gay also be used for someone going from a gay lifestyle to a heterosexual lifesytle? Or "all the events, trials, and experiences of my life that have happened since "coming out" to my world or my "post-gay" events...) Keeper76 21:23, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not written in encyclopedic tone, dubious accuracy, probably not notable, and at best it would be a dicdef anyway, and we don't do those.  Four strikes.  --Lockley 22:03, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep First, badly written is not a deletion reason. Secondly, this term does seem to be widely used. In the first couple of pages of non-wiki ghits, I see articles in salon.com, Sacramento News & Review, nymag.com & a book on Amazon, not to mention several forums. --Fabrictramp 23:03, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.