Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post-harvest Technology Application Centre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  00:33, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Post-harvest Technology Application Centre

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Sources are hard to find for Myanmar but other than a government source, there seems to be nothing to find JMWt (talk) 11:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Myanmar. JMWt (talk) 11:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete or dratify - found a few potential sources- most results are on facebook or blog sites. There's some other government sources with one or two paragraphs here and there (e.g DOCA webpage) and a non-government website that mentions in passing only. I think it fails WP:SIGCOV, but with two sources that discuss it slightly, a more detailed search could find more information.  EmeraldRange  (talk/contribs) 15:52, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete, fails WP:GNG. I was unable to find significant coverage in secondary sources. The government website is a primary source and there is no point in draftifying an article created in 2008. SailingInABathTub 🛁 00:08, 2 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.