Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post Ejaculatory Guilt Syndrome


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Majorly   (hot!)  23:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Post Ejaculatory Guilt Syndrome

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Nomination for deletion, as this syndrome does not have an reliable or secondary sources to confirm it's establishment and existence (see WP:NOTE).


 * Delete A Google Scholar search turns up nothing, as does a Microsoft Live Academic search as does a Google News search, a Google News Archive search and a HighBeam search. The hits that return from a normal Google search are either a result of or mirror of this article, or unreliable. -- Craigtalbert 03:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. The lack of sources sugests a neologism or a hoax. --Akhilleus (talk) 04:32, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete It sounds like it might be true, but that's not nearly good enough for WP. YechielMan 04:40, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Rename to post-ejacultatory depression, a much better known term, and expand the article properly. I'm quite surprised we didn't have an article at that one.DGG 05:59, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and maybe rename to something else. Would seem to be related to post-coital tristesse. BTLizard 09:20, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, 100% original research here. There may or may not be some truth to the claim but that is irrelevant without any attribution.  Google search turns up nothing on this topic that is not a Wikipedia mirror.  Ark yan  &#149; (talk) 15:36, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Note - DGG has a point in that post-ejaculatory depression seems to be a more real, attributable phenomenon - but Post Ejaculatory Guilt Syndrome is a fallacious and made-up "syndrome". Merging this content and redirecting implies an endorsement of the term as being accurate (or even extant) and should not be done.  Certainly no prejudice against creating an article on the real subject from scratch.   Ark yan  &#149; (talk) 15:42, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Fine with me. I userfied the content in case some of it can be reused. DGG 22:49, 26 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment I am betting that there is something like this that exists in a medical journal or some other study, probably called something else. The writer seemed to be going on original research or it was conceived as a hoax.  hombre de haha 20:02, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * There is one result for post-ejaculatory depression but it didn't seem from the snippet like it was being described as a syndrome. -- Craigtalbert 00:43, 27 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.