Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post Your Book


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. No evidence of notability under WP:GNG, no evidenced claims of notability under WP:CORP. joe deckertalk to me 22:30, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Post_Your_Book
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Lacks Reliable sources. One of the sources is the website itself, another appears to be a blurb written by the author for some website. The third and final source is an school newspaper article, which though more reliable than the other sources, is simply not enough to stand on it's own. What's more, these sources are definitely not enough to cause the article to meet WP:N or WP:CORP Sjelin (talk) 19:15, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 13:06, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 13:06, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 13:06, 17 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable, fails WP:FIRM. I commend the resourceful college student who started this online business, and I wish him well with it, but it simply hasn't received the significant coverage from independent reliable sources that is required for an article here. Google News found nothing under postyourbook and only unrelated stuff under "Post Your Book." --MelanieN (talk) 18:13, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm not finding coverage in reliable sources for this business; it does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:CORP.  Gongshow  Talk 22:03, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. Just barely passes A7 speedy.  DGG ( talk ) 04:04, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - could have A7ed but it holds little importance. Anyhow, not notable thus have to delete. It can be notable in future but for now, no reason to keep. → TheSpecialUser TalkContributions* 08:39, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.