Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post peak employment theory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Jclemens (talk) 03:13, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Post peak employment theory

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is pure original research. It does not cite any (secondary ) sources. Though it looks like quackery, I have no definitive opinion on the content, but Wikipedia is not a scientific journal, and the article should be deleted for this reason. Wefa (talk) 19:18, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - fails WP:FRINGE, WP:CRYSTAL, WP:V (see ), WP:N, and WP:OR. It may become notable, who knows?. Bearian (talk) 20:46, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  22:55, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.