Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Postcard & Tag


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This is a WP:Soft delete; the article may be restored by any administrator upon request. MelanieN (talk) 00:18, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Postcard & Tag

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

All references are either companie's own web site or a paid review. No independent coverage. With Google News Search, I was able to found only a handful of hits:. None of those look like reliable independent sources to me. And, the article was written by an account named. Promotional purpose is obvious.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  11:54, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:38, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  17:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment Can't find any coverage in the online archives of any major news outlet in Hong Kong, leaning towards delete. Deryck C. 10:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:16, 21 February 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:18, 28 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.