Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poste Montagnais, Quebec


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 19:18, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Poste Montagnais, Quebec

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Although the article says it is a community it is really an electrical substation and possibly a live in worksite. As such there is no notability. I checked for somewhere to redirect but could find nothing. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 15:36, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:40, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 16:32, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. — hueman1 ( talk  •  contributions ) 16:32, 12 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Poste Montagnais Airport since it's still a place. Reywas92Talk 19:05, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Recognized by the Quebec government's commission on geographic names as a "poste de transport". It was probably a lively community while the power station was under construction, even though it doesn't seem very lively today. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:58, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * A temporary worksite during construction is not automatically notable; a "transport station" is not necessarily a notable community or place and substantive sources are expected since the commission uses other terms for actual communities. Reywas92Talk 13:44, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - used to come up in the Quebec media everytime there was a major power failure in Quebec. Hard to imagine that a location with both an airport and rail service isn't notable. Nfitz (talk) 15:52, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I've added six references to the article, and expanded it somewhat. Nfitz (talk) 17:47, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Per WP:GNG. Jamesallain85 (talk) 22:25, 13 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.