Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Postearly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 03:59, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

Postearly

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Most sources are not independent or reliable. wwwhatsnew blog post is probably independent, but one source won't make it for WP:NCORP. MarioGom (talk) 09:31, 3 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:12, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 09:31, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 09:31, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. MarioGom (talk) 09:31, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom  O n m yw a y 22  talk 09:33, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: as per WP:NCORP, article includes several Significant, Independent, Reliable and Secondary sources. For example wwwhatsnew blog post, Listin Diario, one of the leading newspapers in the Dominican Republic, and the oldest still being published., Forbes feature article on the physical magazine and more. Fran.ziro (talk) 11:17, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability. As to the refs mentioned by Fran.ziro above - blog posts fail WP:RS, the Listin Diario is an article on how the company was selected to go to "Seedstars Summit" in Switzerland but fails to provide any in-depth info on the company (fails CORPDEPTH), and the Forbes reference is 3 sentences that provides a short company description in a list of other company descriptions for their "30 Promising Companies" article. Topic fails WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 21:03, 10 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.