Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pot Casserole


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 22:45, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Pot Casserole

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I have found no reliable source on the existence of Pot Casserole. DrDevilFX (talk) 20:45, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete At best this is not notable, at worst it's a hoax. Either way, delete. --Jersey92 (talk) 21:20, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing turns up in a search. -- Fauzan  ✆ talk  ✉ mail  22:39, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 27 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. It's definitely real, but it's just not notable enough for an article. My searches turned up the odd "Do you remember..."-type post in forums and on social networks but nothing like the coverage needed. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 00:09, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:GNG - Lack of reliable secondary sources. Too bad, because I find it an interesting topic. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 10:20, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DrDevilFX (talk) 20:14, 3 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - No sources, no notability. Also delete Pot Rice. No sources, no notability. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 21:23, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - Additionally Pot Mash should be deleted. --DrDevilFX (talk) 21:42, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - I propose to consider this snow delete discussion for all the three not-notable articles mentioned here. Delete all. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 21:52, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I've prodded Pot Rice and Pot Mash, as they have no sources and I can't find any to suggest they're notable enough for inclusion. Deletion seems uncontroversial to me so let's try and forego the deletion discussion :) Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 01:20, 4 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete All There are no WP:RS to establish any notability. --Clean-up-wiki-guy (talk) 02:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.