Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Potential chemical warfare agent


 * Poorly written microstub, and as written it is redundant with Chemical warfare which is its only link. KeithTyler 20:19, Jun 13, 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Chemical warfare Rossami 01:31, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Contains no useful material. Redirect will be useless, anyone searching will get the main article. Andrewa 03:20, 14 Jun 2004 (UTC)
 * "Potential chemical warfare agent" appears to be a well-known phrase -- a Google search turns up many hits, including some which appear to be technical military documents, . Since someone might search for that exact phrase, a redirect to chemical warfare is appropriate, until someone can expand potential chemical warfare agent into a real article. Wile E. Heresiarch 09:29, 19 Jun 2004 (UTC)

This debate is now closed. Consensus was to delete or redirect: redirect can do no harm so it is redirected. DJ Clayworth 15:45, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)