Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Potion-making: Practice


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus defaulting to Keep and w/o prejudice to a future renomination. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:24, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Potion-making: Practice

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lack of notability TheLongTone (talk) 12:26, 28 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment:I gave links. see page. Comment added by page creator --(talk) 20:01, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Above comment refactored by --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 12:34, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲 水 12:44, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 13:30, 5 July 2018 (UTC)


 * slight lean to keep There are reviews out there, though I don't have any idea as to how notable/authoritative the various sites are. If they are to be believed, the game is quite popular in Russia. I would agree that to be kept there needs to be some claim of notability in the article beyond a vague sketch of the rules. Mangoe (talk) 16:43, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete – At this time. I understand that this is a Russian board game and may be notable in that country.  However, I could not find any secondary – reliable – independent sources located on my search, as shown here .  If someone can produce the evidence I am more than willing to change my mind. ShoesssS Talk 19:13, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 12:35, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Tyw7  (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 12:35, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * weak keep Forbes Russia has an article and a Russian site I don't know anything about but appears to be significant in Russia ranks quite highly.  My Russian is poor on a good day, so I'm not going to claim I fully understand the context of these reviews.  Hobit (talk) 21:46, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Also, looks like a reasonable review in a source I don't recognize but appears to be large and be more than a blog (so appears to have editorial control). Hobit (talk) 22:17, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:13, 13 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.