Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Potion IVI


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 19:48, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Potion IVI

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Per WP:PRODUCT; a product should not have its own article, unless the producer is notable. Even if, it should be merged into the article about the company that produces it. ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ Hey it's me 17:57, 2 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment The nominator is misreading policy, a product that is produced by a company that is not notable may have an article if the product itself is notable. That said, I don't see much evidence that this product is notable. Monty  845  18:06, 2 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  — frankie (talk) 20:10, 3 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - No significant coverage in reliable sources. I found this passing mention. -- Whpq (talk) 16:15, 5 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:32, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.