Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Potions: A Curious Tale


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 10:26, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Potions: A Curious Tale

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced article with no evidence of notability. Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. In addition, WP:CRYSTAL applies. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 02:39, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep I've been looking forward to this game, why delete the entry only to put it back when it goes live? - dennisandvicki, 02:02, 31 March 2015 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dennisandvicki (talk • contribs)
 * Delete No references. Not enough people have heard of it. Possible self-promotion, because only the creator(s) and their friends have likely played this game. Psychotic   Spartan  123  03:11, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Also the user, RikuKat also made the page Stumbling Cat which promotes the video game company that produced Potions: A Curious Tale. WP:SOAP. Psychotic   Spartan  123  03:20, 28 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep References exist. Credible claim of significance, has following of several hundred people. User_talk:RikuKat — Preceding undated comment added 03:30, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Article maintains neutral tone, so WP:SOAP does not apply. User_talk:RikuKat03:34, 28 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Not enough coverage to make this notable. WP: TOOSOON. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) may the force be with you 03:49, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep The development blog for this game has hundreds of followers: As does the development stream: http://www.twitch.tv/rikukitty  The lead developer is extremely active in the game development community has a large following  and has appeared as a guest on game development talks with Rami Ismail  03:57, 28 March 2015 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RikuKat (talk • contribs)
 * comment Youtube, forums, and blogs aren't reliable sources. Psychotic   Spartan  123  04:01, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Struck your bolded !vote above. Comments are unlimited, but you can only !vote once in an AfD czar ⨹   08:57, 29 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG, there's no independent coverage at all of this game. The1337gamer (talk) 15:09, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 29 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It did not have any meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets since its parent company article will similarly be deleted. Please ping me if more (non-English and offline) sources show in the future. czar ⨹   08:57, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.