Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Potkrš


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep; nomination withdrawn per  and  and there are no outstanding delete !votes. Non-admin closure. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 14:17, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Potkrš

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Simply existing doesn't make a place notable. No indication of notability Gnevin (talk) 13:00, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

I strongly suggest you read Notability (geography) and reconsider. You are very much mistaken. ♦ Dr. Blofeld  13:16, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

The village exists.. And a very attractive one.. ♦ Dr. Blofeld  13:22, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: Gnevin isn't saying that this village doesn't exist or isn't lovely, just that existing doesn't automatically make a location notable. I also recommend against editing the submitter's reason for deletion. Just because you don't agree with it doesn't mean that you have the right to edit Gnevin's reason for deletion. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 13:43, 20 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Ah, sorry Gnevin- I thought that this guy was altering your rfd. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 13:45, 20 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.