Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poul S. Jessen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 13:35, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Poul S. Jessen

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Unreferenced biography of an academic created by the article's subject; clearly fails WP:ACADEMIC (not a named professorship; no publications; no highly prestigious academic awards; no indication of having made a significant impact in his scholarly discipline); no references to Jessen in any other article on Wikipedia. BabelStone (talk) 19:52, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 22:59, 20 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: No sources and no notability established. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 23:00, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. A GS h-index of 24 for "P S Jessen" gives a clear pass of WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:34, 21 September 2012 (UTC).
 * Keep. With seven papers with over 100 citations each in Google scholar (with varying authors and listed as first author on two) he clearly passes WP:PROF. The article is in need of cleanup (improvement of sourcing and removal of unsourced personal details) but that's not really what AfD is for. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:31, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 07:34, 27 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:50, 29 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per Xxanthippe and David Eppstein. -- 202.124.75.56 (talk) 13:20, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.