Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pouya Bakhtiari


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Reliability of sources should be discussed at WP:RSN. If it is determined that the sources are not reliable, another AfD nomination could be made. (non-admin closure) buidhe 02:35, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Pouya Bakhtiari

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability issue Saff V. (talk) 14:02, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Saff V. (talk) 14:02, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:50, 19 February 2020 (UTC)


 * keep. Hi. What do you mean by "notability issues"? Secondly, you have mentioned that the article is notable fore an event. It covers all aspects of WP:EVENT and general criteria of WP:NOTABILITY. Covered by third party sources worldwide and the event itself is notable. GharouniTalk 14:58, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per Gharouni. Also do mind that the nomination is by a user who has been warned by an admin to refrain from IRI pov-pushing. --HistoryofIran (talk) 17:14, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep I think there is enough secondary sources available in Persian for this article.فرهنگ2016 (talk) 08:24, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep passes WP:GNG but think the title should be moved to Shooting of Pouya Bakhtiari or Death of Pouya Bakhtiari.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 01:54, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * it means that Pouya Bakhtiari is not natable but the event for his death is. So your vote is a little confusing. Which subject is notable based on your search in google?Saff V. (talk) 09:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)


 * comment please provide RSes which confirm the notability. Just writing “ there is enough secondary sources available in Persian” is not helpful.Saff V. (talk) 09:26, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Yet another disruptive contribution by Saff V., , , , , , , etc. Ping if you deem them inadequate. MS    会話  16:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * @Ms96 It seems that you don't familar with wp:RS or wp:RSP, for example independentpersian or news.gooya are not reliable. Rest of them are BIASED. WP:IIS demanded that Material available from sources that are self-published, primary sources, or biased because of a conflict of interest can play a role in writing an article, but it must be possible to source the information that establishes the subject's real-world notability to independent, third-party sources.In addition BIASED asked that When dealing with a potentially biased source, editors should consider whether the source meets the normal requirements for reliable sources, such as editorial control, a reputation for fact-checking, and the level of independence from the topic the source is covering. So pleas provide independent, third-party sources to prove his notability.Saff V. (talk) 06:41, 26 February 2020 (UTC)


 * keep. Per Gharouni and others. Nika2020 (talk) 02:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * keep. Clearly notable. ‍‍‍‍Telluride (talk) 07:00, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Subject and the particular event is notable. There was significant amount of coverage worldwide. - The9Man  &#124; (talk) 09:15, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete ،The person does not meet the WP:PERSON. M1nhm (talk) 10:07, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * keep. Clearly notable. BlUeRiVeR20 (talk) 21:52, 26 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.