Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Povilas Stulga Museum of Lithuanian Folk Instruments


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 08:17, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

Povilas Stulga Museum of Lithuanian Folk Instruments

 * – ( View AfD View log )

fails WP:ORG. no gnews for the name "Povilas Stulga". and in google it just reveals directory listings. LibStar (talk) 07:20, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. "Povilas Stulga" throws off the search.  Try searching  and you get multiple references to this museum. Examples:,,,("wonderful collection"), ("fascinating array"). --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:06, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep (as creator). Multiple instances of non-trivial coverage. A page in one of the In Your Pocket City Guides, a page in Kauno diena , a page in 15 min . Look for P. Stulgos muziejus in the LT articles (Stulgos is the possesive form of Stulga). It has a lot of minor mentions too because it hosts music/folk dance events; 350 Ghits for Stulgos muziejus . The French govt mentions it as a participant in their 2007 La Nuit des musées , page 11. Novickas (talk) 17:17, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Sufficient sourcing to meet GNG. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 16:57, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.