Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PowerGenix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Stifle (talk) 08:19, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

PowerGenix

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete. Non-notable company. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 02:44, 8 July 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. A business that makes batteries.  The bulk of the very brief article is devoted to selling us the proposition that its nickel-zinc batteries are better than nickel-cadmium batteries. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:59, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. A Google search shows that many sources exist; even restricting it to the most reliable ones, we have coverage from Forbes, Popular Science and ECS transactions, journal of the Electrochemical Society.. That seems like enough to me. Robofish (talk) 00:05, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - Two of the three refs provided by Robofish are good for me. The Newsblaze item is a press release.  There is other coverage however such as  and . -- Whpq (talk) 16:12, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.