Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power Animal (Gaoranger) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 06:08, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Power Animal (Gaoranger)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This does not establish notability independent of Hyakujuu Sentai Gaoranger through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of overly in-depth plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 20:41, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. In six years, not a single source has been added to this article, and it remains a nightmare of in-universe fancruft.  While this does not necessarily indicate that the content is unverifiable, it's a huge red flag.  This article belongs on Wikia, where they don't care about sources, notability, or in-universe writing.  It's completely unsuited for Wikipedia, as I can't find any reliable sources discussing this in depth. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:07, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 12 September 2013 (UTC)


 * merge or redirect  I can't   say it's significant enough for  a separate article, but it should certainly not be deleted. Asking for deletion is saying that we should not even have a cross-reference, that someone who comes here and looks for it will find nothing. Has the nom any reason to say that such is appropriate? If there's no reason against redirection, we shouldn't be asking for deletion.   Anything  someone might want to look up, for which there's relevant content in Wikipedia, should have a redirect.  DGG ( talk ) 02:56, 19 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 05:56, 19 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - no reliable sources to support independent notability. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 02:12, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete (or Merge into Hyakujuu Sentai Gaoranger), no significant coverage from secondary and independent sources that would establish notability per WP:GNG.Folken de Fanel (talk) 16:36, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.