Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power Overwhelming


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's subject is found to not be notable. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 04:13, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Power Overwhelming

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable album, fails WP:NALBUM JMHamo (talk) 10:00, 29 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. An album without articles for its artist and label, and no evidence of notability. sst ✈  14:02, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  sst ✈  14:02, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Billboard.com Comedy Charts as of 12/29 and Linked Image
 * Counter-arguement: This album's credibility can be found in it ranking #3 in Comedy and #19 in Heatseekers on Billboard.com.

It is also #1 in iTunes Comedy and top 200 albums sold on iTunes altogether. (iTunes Store pages do not utilize URLs viewable by browsers. Linked Image — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rampartswewatched (talk • contribs)
 * Comment — Rampartswewatched (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. JMHamo (talk) 21:05, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Credibility ≠ notability. Sales rankings suggest only that a few thousand people bought it, but who is talking about it? There needs to be significant coverage of the album in multiple reliable sources. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 21:18, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Here's some coverage of it to get the ball rolling: 1 2 3 4 5. FalconDrone (talk) 16:13, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment — FalconDrone (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. JMHamo (talk) 21:05, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment Couldn't we just make pages for the things that are needed to make this page okay? I don't know how this works so I may not be accurate about this, so I thought I would ask. (Chocolatejr9 (talk) 17:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC))

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:56, 5 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 07:00, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as best I can tell the only coverage of this is on blogs, which I don't think are reliable ones. Not enough to satisfy the WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC unfortunately. FuriouslySerene (talk) 16:21, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as mentioned, unlikely better notable and solid. SwisterTwister   talk  06:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge into Jake Kaufman. Album is not notable on its own, but certainly a notable piece of Kaufman's career. - Iago Qnsi  (talk) 14:24, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - I don't think there's enough non-promo material here to merge. Wouldn't care if a redirect were made. Definitely not enough for a standalone article.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.