Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power Supply (EP)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Anamanaguchi. Merge has been completed. KaisaL (talk) 15:02, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Power Supply (EP)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NALBUMS. No reviews, no press. Released on an indie label. No evidence of radio rotation. Doesn't inherit notability for having a song as a former theme song for a defunct podcast. MSJapan (talk) 03:38, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:44, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 09:44, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge Whilst I agree that the album is not inherently notable, the band that released it is, so it would probably be better if it were merged into the bands page and then ""deleted"" --Joseon Empire (talk) 19:42, 03 June 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 01:41, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Selective Merge to Anamanaguchi § EPs, which will improve the latter article. It's received some minimal coverage (e.g. ), but not nearly enough to qualify a standalone article. North America1000 15:46, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as there's nothing actual to merge, they are all the same contents, nothing else different and thus if tagged for merge, this will either stay like that or simply be redirected which anyone could've made. Thus there's nothing actually considerable to merge. SwisterTwister   talk  18:01, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment – The merge target I suggested above (Anamanaguchi § EPs) presently only has the name of the album on the page and the date of release, and nothing else. It's unclear how one could assess this as that "they are all the same contents", because the content is not identical whatsoever. Was the merge target suggested even viewed? Perhaps this is an error duplicate copy/paste !vote from another discussion, or of your !vote at Articles for deletion/Single + Remix Collections, which is verbatim to this one. However, the assessment there is also incorrect relative to the content of the two pages. The !votes in this and the other discussion are only one minute apart. Requesting clarification; perhaps an error occurred? North America1000 22:03, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Actually part of the information (and some more info about the EP) was already present at Anamanaguchi, which is a better merge target. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:10, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yellow Dingo (talk) 09:57, 17 June 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 21:48, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Anamanaguchi. This can be simply closed as a redirect now as I have already completed a selective merge. I don't see a need to merge the entire track listing on the main article. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:04, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Rearranged for clarity. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 03:13, 26 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.