Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power Word: IRL Name

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus. Fernando Rizo T/C 03:50, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

Power Word: IRL Name

 * Delete Neologism that only turns up 3 Google hits. Thanks, Luc "Somethingorother" French 13:00, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Policy DV8 2XL 14:38, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep/Merge I did not know where to put this information when I made the article, but it must go somewhere. The google hits are irrelevant because people use many names for this.  Who can suggest where to merge this article?   ChoobWriter 15:48, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I would suggest urbandictionary.com or a similar site ---Outlander 18:38, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Neologism --Outlander 18:38, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Urban dictionary Mcfly 20:55, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep/Merge - Merge this to the "Slang" article or a similar related article on Wiki. UniReb 21:27, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism. --Carnildo 23:15, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, "power word" has 24,300 google hits. JeremyJX 14:16, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * User has only 16 edits. BTW, "power word" is *not* the relevent google search; "Power Word: IRL Name" is. Thanks, Luc "Somethingorother" French 23:36, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, for the abovementioned reasons SamsonFro 14:30, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * User has only 25 edits. Thanks, Luc "Somethingorother" French 23:36, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Uh, and why is 25 edits relevant? There's no policy against voting on vfd with a young account, and for some reason i'm doubting it's an abusive sockpuppet with 25 edits, unless they're all to vfds... -- Phroziac  ( talk ) 23:40, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: This is a c&p from Encyclopedia Dramatica. -HX 00:22, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Being from encyclopedia dramatica, it can't be encyclopedic. :p Is this a copyvio? I looked on ED, and it's released under "no license". Does that mean it stays copyrighted to the people that write the articles then? What a hassle! -- Phroziac  ( talk ) 23:40, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.