Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power and Interest News Report (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 03:32, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Power and Interest News Report
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

I have proposed this page for deletion but another editor has told me that since it was already previously kept at AFD it cannot be deleted by Prod, and suggested I relist it. I think this is a non-notable organization. All the material on the article page was sourced to the organization itself, and all those sources are not not-verifiable, since the organization's web site has been down for several years. It seems that since the previous AFD this organization has disappeared - on the discussion page editors have said its newsletters have not gone out since 2007. There do not seem to be sources that actually discuss the organization (though there are a few that reference materials it has produced), other than the wikipedia article and the organization's Facebook page which is copied form Wikipedia. A Google News search returns "No results found for "Power and Interest News Report"", and a Google Books search returns several books which refer to materials produced by the group, but do not discuss the organization itself.. (I hope I am doing this right - my first time :)) Jeff Song (talk) 19:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:58, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment. It certainly looks non-notable.  Does anyone know why it survived the AfD listing last time around?  Just like to know before I blindly vote in favour of deletion. --Legis (talk - contribs) 06:00, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete It doesn't appear to have attracted significant coverage (or any coverage) while it existed. Google News archive mostly consists of articles from this group being reprinted in the Asia Times. BTW wouldn't you think that if this organization had been notable, someone would have commented on its demise? --MelanieN (talk) 03:35, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:CORP. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 04:32, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.