Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power of the Sea


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 19:52, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Power of the Sea

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Part of a growing collection of articles all created to promote the work of Kamran Qureshi, this 23-minute video fails WP:NFILM. It has apparently been WP:BROADCAST, yes, but I don't believe that trumps our basic notability requirements. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:53, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:00, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:00, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

I am a researcher, just read this article and found it quite informative, infact fit for any encyclopedia and helped me in research. I believe our British Army have more or less same features. I can't see how it is promoting someone? Can anyone explain please? Flowers4mums (talk) 03:21, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * The creator has also created an article on the series Har Dam Tayyar and that is where all these articles on the short episodes should be redirected. They are not independently notable. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:37, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you Shawn in Montreal and Flowers4mums for your time. Articles created by me till todate have diversity in subjects like Motherly wisdom, living and dead personalities, good parenting, how to raise high performing children, young girls choosing their careers, human smuggling, emotions of transgender people, Army, Navy, Air Force, prostitution, music concert film and Importance of Maritime sector and so on... there is no promotion of any individual or company in my articles.

As part of wiki family, I respect all family members and their POV. Reference to my recent articles about Pakistan Army, Navy and Air Force, (Sons of the Soil, Power of the Sea, and Flying Tigers) as they are entirely different in nature, departments and operations and what I understand is, this is the reason why Avtek Media Group made separate documentaries and I have created separate articles as there is a need to justify with the subjects.

The Making show was made and named Har Dam Tayyar for TV promotions to explain audience the topics and importance of these documentaries. This is what article Har Dam Tayyar is saying. I recommend these articles should remain separate and all will have their separate notability. Trust me. Kind regards Talentforfilm (talk) 14:57, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Many (or all?) of those "diversity in subjects" are simply topics addressed in largely non-notable Kamran Qureshi shows that you've created articles for. User:Flowers4mums is a single purpose account that had popped up at Afd to support you, using the same terrible English grammar as you, and I think you and the whole affair is fishy, though I'm not sure what will be done about it. Maybe nothing. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:21, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note to closing administrator. Please see Sockpuppet investigations/Talentforfilm.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:43, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America1000 09:19, 22 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not seperately notable, even 'parent' article is full of dubious sources.Pincrete (talk) 12:51, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * You know, on that point, it's my understanding of WP:TVSERIES that it seems to trump WP:GNG. That if Har Dam Tayyar was nationally broadcast, it doesn't matter if it has reliable sources or not? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:41, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * No, wait, the guideline does provide some parameters: "the presence or absence of reliable sources is more definitive than the geographic range of the program's audience alone...a national television program may not be notable if it was cancelled too quickly to have garnered any significant media coverage."Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:48, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I've taken it to Afd at Articles for deletion/Har Dam Tayyar. Let's see what we shall see. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:57, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:36, 20 July 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk  17:54, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete run-of-the-mill TV fodder, no lasting impact, no reviews, web searches for such a common sequence of words are rather useless, the refs in the article are youtube and vimeo. Kraxler (talk) 18:06, 2 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.