Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power paper


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep.  ¿¡Exir  Kamalabadi?! Join Esperanza! 06:15, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Power paper
Reason Jeffreynye 02:00, 22 October 2006 (UTC) I think this looks like an advertisement.
 * Comment Doesn't look like one to me. Looks like it could be copyvio instead, but The New Scientist isn't in the business of printing advertisments. Imban 02:13, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, Rewrite, Transwiki? It does sound like an advertisement or copyvio, but it's still something. We could just rewrite it, or toss it over to Wikinews.--  the ninth bright shiner   talk 04:38, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Needs tidying perhaps, but not an ad. Emeraude 09:46, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, sort of. I think this should be rebuilt as an article on Power Paper the company, not the product.  If it is to remain as a product focused article, it should be renamed (e.g., Ultra thin printable batteries) and worked over to discuss the technology in generic terms.  As it stands it reads like an advert.  Power Paper the company appears to pass WP:CORP QuiteUnusual 11:41, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.