Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powerdecal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 17:13, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Powerdecal

 * – ( View AfD View log )

It is "a newly coined term, word or phrase, that may be in the process of entering common use, but has not yet been accepted into mainstream language"  @ d \/\/ | | | Talk 01:29, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Eeekster (talk) 02:49, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Snowball delete-per nom.--Müdigkeit (talk) 08:22, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * No books, no scholar, no news, no reliable sources + no notability = no article. Delete.  Dennis Brown (talk) 15:11, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obscure product, no assertion of notability, not covered in any reliable sources as far as I could tell. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 02:04, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.