Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powers and abilities of Franky (One Piece)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 07:07, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

Powers and abilities of Franky (One Piece)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Giant in-universe list of cruft. No verifiable sources to assert its notability. Delete or merge into Franky (One Piece). Sephiroth BCR ( Converse ) 23:47, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions.   —  Sephiroth BCR  ( Converse ) 23:50, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge and cleanup: It seems a bit excessive to have a sub article on a fictional character that is larger that the character's article itself. Shiroi Hane 00:18, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge per above Snarfies 00:35, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - the character article is already ridiculously excessive. Slamming in another enormous chunk is untenable. There's already a sufficient summary in the character article without this material. I can;t think of any fictional character who requires a separate article just to detail their powers. Otto4711 01:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * delete - absolutely unsourced, cruft. Seems unnecessary to have such a large article on the powers and abilities of a fictional character. Wikipedia is not a fansite. Also, why should we allow ourselves to have one article on his powers and abilities, and not have another article on, say, his hairdo? AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 14:16, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Depends - does he have a cool hairdo? ^_^ Snarfies 22:02, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The parent article is already pretty detailed about powers. There is no possible real-world relevance or usefulness of an article like this.  Plus, I can't imagine there is a hope of third party sourcing it. Gnfnrf 17:20, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Really little more than a fork, and it's not going to meet WP:V (the main article doesn't).  Adrian  M. H.  23:27, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Dlete  JJ Williams 20:44, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - too often our articles turn into nothing more than trivia about crap. I know that is not very delicate wording, but this stuff really needs to go. Trivia of the mundane must go quickly, silently into the long, dark. --Storm Rider (talk) 07:51, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per 10poundHammer, AllGlorytotheHypnotoad, Gnfnrfet and Strom Rider. Bearian 19:07, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.