Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PrOphecy sun


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  07:54, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

PrOphecy sun

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

My searches found nothing to suggest the artworks have been permanently collected by major art museums "PrOphecy sun artist permanent collections" easily found nothing and the article, albeit sourced, has nothing else to suggest solid independent notability. I would've nearly speedied also given the rather hinting advertorial tone and the listed "reviews and links", I'll also note the exhibitions are not at actual museums either, but instead festivals and event halls. SwisterTwister  talk  22:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - As noted by nominator, inadequate evidence of notability, as well as having a non-neutral tone. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:01, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * As a performance artist and musician prOphecy sun is unlikely to be in any collections, though as far as I can tell that is besides the point, as the notability guide clearly that 3-5 citations from proper independent sources is what is required to meet the notability guidelines. I am uncertain how deletion can be suggested for lacking notability using a measure that is not indicated in the official wiki notability guidelines. I did edit the language to try to eliminate the biased tone. Thebaconfairy (talk) 07:24, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:48, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

1.	…subject of multiple, non-trivial, published…in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of...: Not demonstrated 2.	…single or album…national music chart: Not demonstrated 3.	…record certified gold or higher: Not demonstrated 4.	…non-trivial coverage…reliable sources…international/national concert tour…: Not demonstrated 5.	…two or more albums on a major record label/more important indie labels...: Not demonstrated 6.	…ensemble that contains two or more independently notable musicians, or… prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles…: Not demonstrated 7.	…one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style/scene..: Not demonstrated 8.	…won or been nominated for a major music award…: Not demonstrated 9.	…won first, second or third place in a major music competition…Not demonstrated 10.	…performed music for a work of media that is notable…: Not demonstrated 11.	…in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network: Not demonstrated 12.	…subject of a substantial broadcast segment…national radio or TV...: Not demonstrated
 * Delete Non-notable. Let’s go with the WP:MUSBIO for Musicians/ensembles:

There is no evidence to pursue notability elsewhere. Nikto  wha?  03:25, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

I feel like I am beating my head against the wall here. In response to Nikto, point # 1 subject of multiple, non-trivial, published…in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of...: Not demonstrated --> this has been demonstrated SwisterTwister kindly pointed out the citations. The best sources are multiple entries from The Georgia Straight- which is the major lifestyle newspaper from Vancouver, a major metropolis city. One of the articles cited from it is the cover story of that issue. Though first and foremost I am sure she would consider herself a performance artist, which her music is apart of. BF (talk) 21:21, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Understanding your position; WP:TOOSOON. Don't be frustrated, be persistent.  Nikto   wha?  23:24, 7 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.