Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Praça TV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep after being withdrawn by nominator. Procedural close. (non-admin closure) Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 01:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Praça TV

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I guess, but I am not sure, that this article is not about a program or a TV station but about a time-frame allocated for local TV. Nearly incomprehensible, partly untranslated. Seems to fail WP:GNG due to namesakes. The Banner talk 22:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:29, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:29, 15 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Local equivalent to BBC's time set aside for regional news. Could use some help but a basic clean-up should clarify things.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 23:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note When starting a AfD with guessing, you should have started a discussion (on the talk page) first. Please read WP:BEFORE. Sander.v.Ginkel (Talk) 20:40, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Please, take care of your own sloppy articles first instead of following me around, Sander. The Banner talk 10:33, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Are notorious because they are local news from TV Globo, then there is no reason to put to delete. Bian tez  msg 22:08, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment Banner, please don't attack others. They have a point; you should have put up an "expand Portuguese" template on here to flag it as needing help from Brazilian editors familiar with that country's television industry, or tried to make sense of what was said rather than a direct AfD; I've done the work but whatever issues you have with other editors, keep them out of deletion discussions and focus on the articles.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 20:32, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I have learned long ago that expecting real action of other editors is usually a distant dream. So an in comprehensive article will be send to AfD instead of gambling that others take their responsibility. In most cases, nothing will happen at all. This article is pleasant exception on that. Nomination withdrawn as article is now readable and understandable. The Banner talk 00:25, 28 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.