Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prabhjit Singh Uppal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 01:22, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Prabhjit Singh Uppal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable at all. Google search confirms he barely exists but that is all. See for yourself. Also, article created by someone with promo username. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 20:25, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me)  20:37, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me)  20:37, 27 April 2013 (UTC) Edit:  czar   &middot;   &middot;  21:45, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  20:38, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  20:38, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  20:38, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Delete. Subject does not satisfy the specific notability guidelines for college athletes per WP:NCOLLATH or professional football players per WP:NGRIDIRON, and there is insufficient coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources to satisfy the general notability guidelines per WP:GNG. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * "Barely exists" Either the subject exists or does not. In all fairness, I ask the nominator to strike the word "barely" from the nomination or otherwise re-word.  And then, I am left to agree that no coverage exists for the subject and take the position of Delete.  If significant coverage surfaces, I would be pleased to change my position  To summarize:  the subject exists;  the coverage of the subject barely exists;  the notability of the subject does not exist.--Paul McDonald (talk) 21:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Not notable person. Wekipedia is not the stage for self-promotion. This article should be deleted quickly.Jussychoulex (talk) 04:21, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.