Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prada and Prejudice


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Meets WP:NBOOK. (non-admin closure) ɴᴋᴏɴ21  ❯❯❯  talk  05:35, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Prada and Prejudice

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication this meets WP:NBOOK. No in-depth independent sources found on a search, including of Newspapers.com. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:13, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:13, 15 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Weak delete . There's a review in Publisher's Weekly, and then a few blog reviews. I don't think the blog reviews (see here and here, among others) rise to the level of meeting WP:NBOOK criteria number 1, though. Criteria 2-5 don't apply. If someone can find another RS to supplement the Publisher's Weekly source that isn't a blog or press release, I'll amend my !vote. --Kbabej (talk) 01:32, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Based on the sources Spicy found, I am amending my previous !vote. --Kbabej (talk) 16:52, 15 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Weak keep I found three other reviews on Gale:  The reviews are fairly brief, but I think there is just about enough here to pass WP:NBOOK. Spicy (talk) 02:14, 15 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Weak keep based upon reviews above, there's just about enough to scrape past WP:NBOOK criteria 1 (though the reviews aren't incredibly in-depth). Best, Eddie891 Talk Work 15:32, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: multiple reviews in reliable sources are sufficient to satisfy WP:NB #1. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 20:15, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: a short but decent review section. This could easily be expanded into a decent article. Archrogue (talk) 19:36, 19 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.