Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pradeep Kumar Kapur


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 23:54, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Pradeep Kumar Kapur

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I started to tidy this article up and gave up about a third of the way through. The only independent reliable source is the Economic Times one, I can't find any other reliable sources mentioning him, definitely nothing that would meet WP:GNG. The article is also overly promotional in tone and written like a CV. Sarahj2107 (talk) 13:31, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Withdrawn It still needs more references but now that at lest some have been added and the promotional material removed I am happy to withdraw my nomination. Thank you Samuel J. Howard for cleaning up the article and finding the additional sources. Sarahj2107 (talk) 07:18, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 13:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 13:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —  San ska ri  Hangout 13:34, 23 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. an ambassador from India to two other countries is going to meet WP:GNG. See, , this Indian article calls him a "luminary" , , . Presumably there are other sources in Hindi, Spanish, and Cambodian that I'm not equipped to access.--Samuel J. Howard (talk) 14:08, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * More:, , , , , . Not all of these are appropriate sources, but they help demonstrate that ambassadors get wide coverage.--Samuel J. Howard (talk) 14:19, 23 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment the figure may meet GNG with two reliable sources. However, the article is very problematic as promotional and for lack of citations.--JumpLike23 (talk) 15:31, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I've cleaned it up and added some sourcing.--Samuel J. Howard (talk) 16:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
 * looking more like a keep now. --JumpLike23 (talk) 16:04, 23 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Ambassadors are not automatically notable, but are often notable anyway, especially when they come from major countries such as India. I think we now have enough reliable sources for notability, and the removal of the walls of unsourced text is a big improvement. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:19, 24 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.