Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pragma-dialectics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 15:02, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

Pragma-dialectics
Non-notable, few Google results for either term. — ceejayoz talk  01:02, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. — ceejayoz talk [[Image:Flag_of_Australia.svg|24px]] 01:02, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- howcheng  [ talk &#149; contribs &#149; web ] 20:36, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - genuine and verifiable theory, subject of numerous books from several academic presses (e.g., ). Merely failing to get tens of thousands of Google hits is not a criterion for deletion. &mdash; Haeleth Talk 21:08, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is one of the major approaches to argumentation, which is what is known in North America as informal logic. Perhaps the title should be changed to "Pragma-dialectical Approach to Argumentation." Moreover, wikipedia article on "argumentation theory" has to be merged with this; it is talking about the same thing.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.