Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prague tourism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Prague. Will leave the history in place so anyone can merge any of it to whatever page#section they feel is most appropriate. J04n(talk page) 17:22, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Prague tourism

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article on Prague which reads like a guidebook not an encyclopedia. May have a place on Wikitravel but not on Wikipedia. According to the talk page, it was written by an official tourist organisation. Lincolnite (talk) 15:22, 19 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Just another imperfect start to a notable topic. I have reduced it to a stub based upon a reasonable source.  It would probably be sensible to merge into Tourism in the Czech Republic, following the source. Warden (talk) 16:27, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge. Arguably this could be expanded into a decent article. However, as it stands after editing by Warden, only one small fact from the article is not already mentioned at Prague.  That fact is "more than half the visitors to the Czech Republic stay there". This is could go in Prague next to "Almost one-half of the national income from tourism is spent in Prague."  I'm inclined to say merge... but if someone wants to come along later and create a bigger article I have no objections to them doing that (assuming it is more like an encyclopedia article than the version before Warden edited it). Yaris678 (talk) 18:03, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:43, 20 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge as suggested. Bearian (talk) 18:44, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge - as suggested above or move to/rename Tourism in Prague to make it clear we are talking about the idea, rather than an organisation tasked with promoting said idea (which is actually made clear in the first line). But the latter should only be done if someone plans to expand it. Can always be split out later after all. Stalwart 111  00:53, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge into and redirect to relevant sections of Prague until someone decides to (massively) expand. Ansh666 21:47, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Relevant sections? Yes there is more than one relevant section of Prague... but how can you redirect to more than one section?  Yaris678 (talk) 08:11, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, I meant whichever one whoever does it thinks is most appropriate. But maybe we should propose a multiple-redirect, which reads the user's mind and chooses where to go...(joking, of course!) Ansh666 10:44, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.