Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pragyan CMS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:16, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Pragyan CMS

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Promotion. Cannot find any notability signs for this article. Haakon (talk) 10:01, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete can't find any either. A mention in the Pragyan is enough. --Enric Naval (talk) 12:33, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to Pragyan. The CMS software seems nicely designed, but only designed for a single purpose. It's only major use seems to be the Pragyan, and its only other notability so far the bug- and vulnerability listings. Perhaps it can be an article in the future, but not now. -- BenTels (talk) 14:01, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

But what about the http://www.nitt.edu ? This also uses the Pragyan CMS. I do agree that it is not so popular now, but is that in the policy of wikipedia that only highly popular software will be listed? (Also, how do you define *popular* ?) After all, there's no damage done to wikipedia if the article exists, as the interested people will definitely look into the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhishekdelta (talk • contribs) 14:15, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: No, it's not about popularity, but (among others) about notability. That is, how much notoriety has the software gathered, has its existence been noted throughout the industry? Wikipedia also has an article about OpenIndiana, which is hardly the most popular OS in the world – it's included because notability has been established for that project. -- BenTels (talk) 15:26, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * See general notability guideline for the definition of "notability". -- intgr [talk] 17:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Removed those tooth-rottingly spammy words. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.129.195.143 (talk) 11:34, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per above – I found a COI as well (user name hints at it). Raymie (t • c) 04:55, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is also tooth-rottingly spammy: a simple and fast multiuser CMS or Content Management System to organize collaborative web-content... It allows very fine user & group permissions and provides an interface for quickly generating pages...  - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:33, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, no significant coverage in reliable sources and it is yummy yummy spam. --Nuujinn (talk) 21:55, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.