Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prakash Babu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Being bold and closing this one early. Missvain (talk) 17:15, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Prakash Babu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A non notable Bharatiya Janata Party member. Kutyava (talk) 20:47, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:04, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:04, 7 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Subject Fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG.- Akhiljaxxn (talk) 09:32, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Subject has not held any political role that passes WP:NPOL, and the article is not referenced anywhere near well enough to make his unsuccessful candidacy for an NPOL-passing office more nationally or internationally special than everybody else's unsuccessful candidacies. As always, GNG is not just "count the footnotes and keep anything that hits or exceeds two"; it also takes into account the depth of how substantively any given source is or isn't about him, the geographic and temporal ranges of how widely and enduringly he's getting covered, and the context of what he's getting covered for, and some types of coverage just don't count for as much as others. Bearcat (talk) 19:41, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Bharatiya Janata Party member obviously non-notable Fails WP:NPOL. The article is nowhere better cited to create nationally or internationally than the unsuccessful candidate, Fails WP:GNG. - Nocturnal306  talk  21:15, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per our usual outcomes as noted. This is an ordinary youth committee leader of a political party. Bearian (talk) 20:58, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * delete all I could find was routine coverage of him while he was running for the office. Every candidate who runs for MP/member of parliament is bound to have that sort of coverage. It does not assert notability. The subject fails general notability guidelines, because there is no significant coverage of them. Also, the subject clearly fails notability guidelines for politicians. also per Bearcat. —usernamekiran(talk) 10:45, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak delete- Fails WP:NPOL, however there are sources from a few relaible sources such The New Indian Express but still he fails WP:GNG. Page can be there once there are a few more reliable news sources. Shashanksinghvi334 (talk) 06:47, 13 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.