Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prakash Bare


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. The article needs cleaning up, but it appears the subject passes WP:BASIC. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 15:12, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Prakash Bare

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable actor and producer. AutomaticStrikeout 01:54, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:59, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:59, 4 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete if someone recognizable like Articles_for_deletion/Anand_Bhatt_(musician) doesn't qualify then this person DEFINITELY does not qualify as WP:NOTABLE Wikijustice2013 (talk) 04:48, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment I think Wikijustice2013 needs to be blocked. They are just copy/pasting the same Delete "vote" and comment in every AfD. Also, I believe Wikijustice2013 and 99.99.174.248 are sockupuppets; see the Afd for Anand Bhatt, where 99.99.174.248 voted about 20 times and was warned by admin Mr. Stradivarious. --76.189.97.91 (talk) 20:49, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * If you think he is a sockpuppet, this is not the place to deal with that. Until he is blocked, he is entitled to his vote. AutomaticStrikeout 20:54, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Automatic, you're misunderstanding what's going on. He is not even reading any of the AfDs. In fact, he says "this person" when some of the subjects aren't even people. ;) It appears he's simply copy/pasting the same thing in every Afd because he's upset that Anand Bhatt was deleted. If that's the case, he is in fact not entitled to participate as it's very disruptive editing. I am simply making other editors aware of what's going on. And for the record, we do not "vote" on Wikipedia. See WP:VOTE. Thanks. --76.189.97.91 (talk) 21:14, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * You're right, we don't vote, that was poor wording on my part. If it's true that the above !vote is being copied everywhere, I'd imagine the closing admin will take that into consideration when evaluating consensus. AutomaticStrikeout 21:23, 10 September 2012 (UTC)


 * No problem. And it's not "if" it is true; it is true. All you have to do is look at his edits for verification. --76.189.97.91 (talk) 21:30, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, I'd imagine he's probably in violation of WP:Point. However, since he was warned on his talk page, he hasn't been at it anymore, so maybe he got the message. AutomaticStrikeout 21:40, 10 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Strong keep There is lots of reliably sourced coverage on this guy, such as:, , , , , , , and . There are plenty more. His notability is clearly established. However, the article consists of one sentence, so it needs some serious improvement. --76.189.97.91 (talk) 21:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:48, 11 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Both Wikijustice2013 and 99.99.174.248 have been blocked by Postdlf for sockpuppetry and retaliatory AfD postings.. --76.189.97.91 (talk) 03:44, 11 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep – This person passes WP:BASIC and WP:GNG. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:18, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.