Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prakash Gantela


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:58, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Prakash Gantela

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet the basic notability guidelines of English Wikipedia. Marvellous Spider -Man 05:35, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 07:05, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 07:05, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 07:05, 19 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Although unarguably devout and worthy, the subject does not meet standards for Wiki notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:13, 19 August 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete. Poorly sourced, not sufficient to verify the claims made in article. The lack of reliable sources means that notability has not been established when judged against WP:BASIC or WP:NACADEMIC. Drchriswilliams (talk) 07:37, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as advertising and not notable, which of course is enough; I frankly consider this G11. SwisterTwister   talk  07:57, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree that the writing looks promotional, but in a way that is common enough when people write about their own religious leaders and that probably isn't blatant enough for G11. Despite that, I agree that this fails WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:30, 24 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.