Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prakash Neupane (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America1000 00:26, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Prakash Neupane
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article fails to establish notability per WP:MUSIC. The only sources listed on the article are self-promoting. Unable to find any substantive independent coverage of the subject. Nominated for Speedy in the past and previously listed at AfD with the result of softdelete due to lack of participation.  Pax  Verbum  04:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment More information is required. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yuuuu1000 (talk • contribs) 08:48, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Can you be more specific? I feel like I listed the reasons clearly, and they are evident by looking at the article itself. Thank you! - Pax  Verbum  21:31, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:23, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:26, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  14:51, 19 July 2016 (UTC)


 * revise I suggest that reliable media sources is provided like articles etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yuuuu1000 (talk • contribs) 11:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)


 * This Person may be new to the field of Music. सरोज उप्रेती (talk) 04:49, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is true, and it seems that it is, that means they are likely not notable, and hence the above cited reasons for deletion, at least for now. - Pax  Verbum  04:56, 23 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete, somewhat reluctantly, since Nepali musicians are not exactly over-represented on English Wikipedia. But the utter lack of independent sources, as well as the lack of any real claim to notability in the article, indicate that Prakash is not yet notable enough for an article. (That the photo of him is clearly a selfie doesn't exactly scream "notable" either.) --bonadea contributions talk 17:53, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per Notability. The article contains three sources: this articleWebCite, this articleWebCite, and this articleWebCite. The websites are dubiously reliable and do not provide significant coverage about the subject. I searched for sources and was unable to find any sources that provided significant coverage about the subject. No prejudice against recreation if new reliable sources surface that provide significant coverage of the subject. Cunard (talk) 05:46, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as nothing at all close to actually satisfying any form of independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  21:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing here of any significance. Fails WP:GNG. Author has been removing CSD tags and even the current AfD notice.  Velella  Velella Talk 08:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.