Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pramilla Chaturvedi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:35, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Pramilla Chaturvedi

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

I have rejected CSD on this one, as I'm really not sure. It is possible that this is a woman who has served as a known example for female education in India. It is also possible that this is a woman who has lived a praiseworthy life, but does not meet the threshold of WP:N. Honestly, I have no idea. I couldn't find any English language sources on the internet, yet there may be sources in Hindi or other Indian languages around. My google-fu for different scripts is greatly lacking though, so I prefer to take this venue Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 20:42, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 8 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable personality. No search results. Her achievements are nothing extra-ordinary.--Dwaipayan (talk) 03:12, 9 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - article does not show that her life was significant in bringing about changes in women's education, though this is implied. Needs evidence (secondary sources) to demonstrate significance.  TrulyBlue (talk) 15:06, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability, also there seems to be no reference for some dubious claims. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛  Talk Email 12:03, 12 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Do not Delete The contents are sigmnificant for the reason that rather than resorting to mere lectures or writing of papers, the subject toook it upon herself to present an example. further the fact that it was done in a small town was quite noteable given the enviorment and situation at the time. the impact was noticed by the families of cicvil servants, engineers and others at that time it was also coovered by the media, though the refrences are not traceable now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adhishsharma (talk • contribs)
 * Could you give an indication of the extent and kind of the media coverage? Was it newpapers? Magazines? Is there any chance you can still find some of it back somehow? 08:25, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.