Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PranaVayu Yoga


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 00:06, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

PranaVayu Yoga

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable with no reliable sources. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 19:14, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 19:28, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 19:28, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.   —Ism schism (talk) 19:28, 9 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Scientizzle 16:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment There are no references from Google Scholar or Google Books. As is, the article should be deleted. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 22:05, 18 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Wizardman  17:04, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The topic is mentioned in Yoga related pages, but far less than other notable techniques. I don't doubt that there can be reliable sources found for the technique, but as it is I think it hasn't recieved widespread recognition to be notable enough for an encyclopaedic article. Delete. Amalthea Talk 14:49, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - commercial advertisement, not encyclopaedic by its nature as no yoga like this exists that deserves independent notability. Wikidās ॐ 22:50, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete As per above. I almost thought it was original research.  Lady   Galaxy  22:27, 27 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.