Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pranay Reddy Vanga


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 22:22, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Pranay Reddy Vanga

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Blatent self promotion. Page was moved to Draft looking for more sources but the subject has returned it to mainspace after removing the sources that were there. Legacypac (talk) 17:43, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete. I'm not too concerned about the history of the page, but about the subject himself. It appears that he has been involved in one significant film. I think this is WP:Too Soon for an article. 21:01, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - This is an inadequately sourced autobiography. As noted, involved in one significant film.  If a neutral editor is ready during the seven-day deletion discussion to make it into an adequately sourced article that establishes notability, that is different.  Robert McClenon (talk) 01:16, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - User:Edaham tried to save this by moving it to draft space, but if the author is determined to have it in article space, one of the features of article space is Articles for Deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:18, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - overlooking the reticent, or possibly defiant attitude of the editor who reinstated the material without improving it or seeking the assistance made available through AfC, it’s now a BLP with no refs and a PROD candidate. In this case, I agree the history of the page doesn’t matter because there’s no version of the page we could restore it to, which would make it a passable mainspace candidate. I do think the article could exist if the editors involved (excluding the subject himself if this is an auto-bio) in creating the page put in the effort to provide verifiable inline citations. This would probably involve scaling the article down and removing the trivial autobiographical info. Edaham (talk) 01:56, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 02:37, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 02:37, 19 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete and Redirect to Arjun Reddy. Does not appear to meet ANYBIO or have signficant independent coverage unrelated to that film. Nor does it appear that Bhadrakali Pictures — an alternative possibility for an article — passes CORP, despite the claim in this press release. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 11:27, 19 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.