Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prapimporn Karnchanda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 08:10, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Prapimporn Karnchanda

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I could not identify any independent reliable source, in Thai or English, that provides in-depth coverage of the subject. Best I could find was her being nominated for a best stuntwoman award in 2011. While the article creator has made effort to also create the relevant film articles for context, most of them hardly seem notable either. Paul_012 (talk) 06:32, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Paul_012 (talk) 06:32, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Paul_012 (talk) 06:32, 13 January 2018 (UTC)


 * What a pity. I thought she was famous in Thailand (Nie ulega żadnej wątpliwości, że istnieje sterta źródeł po tajsku, pl:User Talk:The Polish). And yet she has performed significant roles in other films, e.g. The Lady (2011 film), Boy Golden: Shoot to Kill, and BloodMonkey. Hence it follows that everybody wants to know smth about this exotic woman. It's very important, no doubt about it. If you delete our Pim in English, we'll translate her into other languages. --Janggun Dungan (talk) 17:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Here is the most reliable source: "a ray of light in the dark kingdom" (Nikolay Dobrolyubov). Do you know whom this phrase refers to? Prapimporn Karnchanda, of course. The watchers and critics are unanimous in the opinion that BloodMonkey is a rotten film. But Pim is the only delightful character in this tedious movie:

What you find the girl of Jungla Jean? It is stupendous. Definitively it is beautiful. (Bloodmonkey (2007) Movie Script 00:20:35 --> 00:20:40)

The Wikipedians in dewiki (plwiki etc.) share this appraisal and do not remove our "girl of Jungla Jean" from other Wikipedias. --Janggun Dungan (talk) 19:56, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:39, 14 January 2018 (UTC)


 * First and foremost, thanks for your information concerning Thai sources. It is a regrettable fact that my favourite character in the above-mentioned film is not a celebrity in Thailand. I do not have any problem with your proposed deletion if only because we have got 7 additional Prapimporns Karnchandas in other Wikipedias. To speak the truth, I'd like to have 10 Prapimporns at least. For "happiness is not in money beautiful women, but in shopping their amount" (Marilyn Monroe). But it isn't a problem. It's easy to increase the amount of Prapimporns Kanjundas in Wikipedia just as is the creator of numerous Angguns (als:Anggun, cs:Anggun, uz:Anggun etc.). We can follow 's example and launch a new WikiProject, viz. "Kanjunda Translations." I've already explained (pl:User Talk:Warszawiak22) the reason for my creating WP articles about the actress under discussion. After I had finished watching BloodMonkey I wanted to learn something about the exotic actress playing the part of Chenne. For this purpose I addressed myself to the corresponding article in WP and was surprised at the fact that the Asian actress was not even mentioned there. This lack of information in Wikipedia compelled me to begin searching the Web. At last, I created a stub and expounded information obtained by me. Isn't it WP:AGF? I do not have any connections and interest to do any advertising. Besides, it makes no matter to me that my English Kanjunda has been proposed for deletion here. Enwiki is not the sole Wikipedia which our exotic "girl of Jungla Jean" can live in. We've already endowed her with multiple citizenship in several Wikipedias and nobody drives her away (in contrast to English Wikipedians). --Janggun Dungan (talk) 14:51, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

nl:Prapimporn Karnchanda, a new item in our WikiProject "Kanjunda Translations", has already been approved by Dutch administrators (nl:Gebruiker:Tulp8 and nl:User:DirkVE). Now we are in a position to say that our new WikiProject can be divided into several sections:
 * Department of the Germanic languages:
 * Prapimporn Karnchanda
 * de:Prapimporn Karnchanda
 * nl:Prapimporn Karnchanda
 * af:Prapimporn Karnchanda
 * Finno-Ugric Department:
 * fi:Prapimporn Karnchanda (planned)
 * et:Prapimporn Karnchanda
 * and so on.


 * The Department of Slavistics:
 * pl:Prapimporn Karnchanda
 * cs:Prapimporn Karnchanda
 * uk:Прапімпорн Карнчанда
 * to be continued.


 * Department of Iranistics: zenana for two Prapimporns Kanjundas in Western Farsi a. Eastern Farsi respectively (because I had been a shah before I became a janggun)
 * Department of Turkology (planned): uz:Prapimporn Karnchanda etc. (because a wiki-friend of mine comes from Samarqand) No. Nothing of the sort. I've changed my mind. I don't think that a user from Samarqand fits in well with our WikiProject. Although the Uzbeks (like our "girl of Jungla Jean") are mongoloids WP:reliable sources witness that Thai women are fond of Caucasian men. This makes it obligatory for us to find a jigit  aqsaqal Wikipedian who is 1) a Caucasian man and at the same time 2) a native speaker of a turkic language. For this reason the turkic section of our great WikiProject should be developed by  from Kabardino-Balkaria. Hope our "girl of Jungla Jean" will be happy with an invitation to  the North Caucasus.

We'll create these departments of our new WikiProject when we have time. We can also invent other departments, e.g. the Department of Indologie (id:Prapimporn Karnchanda). But the most interesting section of our brilliant WikiProject might be Prapimporn Karnchanda in the Amharic alphabet. Be bold! In accordance with this rule, there will be a great deal (harem) of Prapimporns Karnchandas in Wikipedia with the consequence that it is too late to remove our exotic "girl of Jungla Jean" from our free (!) encyclopaedia. --Janggun Dungan (talk)`  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep actress woth international notoriety from a series of major films. Plenty of coverage in Thai. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:43, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * This is patently false. As I stated in the nomination, there is zero coverage in Thai, save for that single non-notable award nomination. --Paul_012 (talk) 05:59, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:50, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment Leaning to delete Please keep in mind that per general notability guideline, this person still needs significant coverage to assume her notability. I don't agree with comments that she has plenty of coverage in Thai, because sources barely cover her biography and such. --Horus (talk) 03:04, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Judging from 's remarks, is mistaken when he says: "Plenty of coverage in Thai." In addition, he uses a strange (strictly speaking, inappropriate) word, namely: "notoriety." But he's right in saying "(the woman's notability stems) from a series of major films." Prapimporn's significant roles in notable films (BloodMonkey a. "The Lady") are enough to establish her notability. --Janggun Dungan (talk) 11:24, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Why are you still confused? She might played in notable films, so what? This article is barely a biography, just a list of her work. You should better find the source covering about her life in detail, or I'm not convinced that she's notable. --Horus (talk) 13:23, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 04:16, 26 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete -- does not meet WP:NACTOR as the roles are minor. No WP:SIGCOV to meet WP:GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:24, 26 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.