Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prarambhik Islamic Aakraman Evam Bhartiya Pratirodh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:35, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Prarambhik Islamic Aakraman Evam Bhartiya Pratirodh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable books. Clearly promotion and fails WP:Notability. No coverage in WP:RS Harshil169 (talk) 03:43, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bibliographies-related deletion discussions. Harshil169 (talk) 03:43, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Harshil169 (talk) 03:43, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Harshil169 (talk) 03:43, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Harshil169 (talk) 03:43, 27 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete The title except one word appears to be in a foreign language, which raises doubts was to whether it is notable for the English WP. A review by an RSS magazine suggests it may be portraying a Hindutva POV of history, not an objective one.  And that is before the question of the commercial tag, which suggests it is a mere ADVERT.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:20, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Without an opinion on the article subject, I just want to say that I don't think any of these issues (besides the advert part) are reasons to delete the article. Articles subjects don't need to be covered in English language sources to be considered notable, and the book having a POV also isn't a rationale to delete the article. Sam Walton (talk) 14:52, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete From what I can see, it fails WP:NBOOK. There are no reviews to be found in my searches, and it's unclear whether the references even cover the book and how much. Also WP:PROMO issues, which Wikipedia is not. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 13:03, 4 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.