Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prashast Singh's Vishwavijay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted by Sergecross73, CSD G4: Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion, Articles for deletion/Vishwavijay (film). Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:22, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Prashast Singh's Vishwavijay
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NFILM: apart from a passing one-line mention in an NDTV roundup, the sources are all database entries, and the reviews are just from a handful of user ratings websites. McGeddon (talk) 20:04, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:05, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:05, 30 January 2016 (UTC)


 * specific alts:
 * and WP:INDAFD gives us "Vishwavijay Movie" "Prashast Singh"
 * and WP:INDAFD gives us "Vishwavijay Movie" "Prashast Singh"
 * and WP:INDAFD gives us "Vishwavijay Movie" "Prashast Singh"

Michael Q.]]'' 02:51, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per being somewhat TOO SOON. Only recently released, the project does not have an acceptable level of coverage. If/when that changes, this can be resurrected. And if it comes back, the title requires fixing per WP:NCF. While sources speak of it in relationship to it's filmmaker, that is not its name. This should most simply be Vishwavijay.  Schmidt,  ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|


 * Keep WHEN THE FILM IS NOTABLE, HAS GOOD SOURCES, AND HAS EVEN ARTICLES ON NOTABLE SITES LIKE NDTV, BOLLYWOOD HUNGAMA ETC THEN WHY DOES EVERYONE WANT SO. THE FILM HAS BEEN RELEASED AND YOU WIKIPEDIANS STILL ARE STUCK IN OLD MENTALITY. WHY DID INJUSTICE? THE TITLE MAY BE CHANGED TO VISHWAVIJAY ONLY, BUT NOT TO BE DELETED, PLEASE RETHINK YOUR DECISION.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.201.81.167 (talk • contribs) 05:03, 31 January 2016
 * Please review WP:NF and WP:RS. A film being listed in numerous databases is not the same as it having critical analysis and commentary.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 10:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:40, 6 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep I can't understand why and how does Wikipedia keeping trying these cheap tricks? When the concensus didn't give the verdict of deleting, everyone now took a jump for another attempt. How long? No idea. I have seen many cases where films don't even have references, and there pages are never deleted. Besides, many a pages of independent films were deleted because they were not 'listed in any database'. When this one is, everyone is after it. This has given me a wrong impression about Wikipedia. Nevertheless, I am neither the filmmaker nor his agent but I do understand very well that why he had previously told me not to try again.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.97.81.115 (talk) 12:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I can find no previous deletion discussion about this article. If there was a discussion, please provide a link. Thanks. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 17:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Looks like it's at Articles for deletion/Vishwavijay (film), from January last year. (There's a history of socking to recreate it.) Which means this should be speedy deleted as the recreation of an AfD'd article. I'll flag it now. --McGeddon (talk) 17:29, 9 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete on the merits. The numerous database links show that the film exists and was released - which is good as far as it goes. But there is only one news link about the film, and it has only a passing mention about this film being released (and, indeed, is mostly about other films). To be considered notable, the film must be noted - and, so far, it has not been. The usual caveats apply, of course - if the film enters a wider release and sees some success, and (most importantly) that success is reported upon, then an article might be appropriate. And if that turns out to be the case, go over to WP:REFUND and show them that coverage. They'll undelete before you can say "Vishwavijay". Until then, however, it's too soon. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 17:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.