Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prateek Chakravorty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. With permission for early relisting by a non-sock Spartaz Humbug! 16:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Prateek Chakravorty

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG, Not enough reliable independent sources. Nothing greater than that of trivial mentions. Most of the details added about him especially personal details are unsourced, I don't know from where the author got such details.  O n m yw a y 22  talk 06:03, 2 August 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Noting that the nominator was blocked for sockpuppetry, but not in violation of WP:CSD. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  06:35, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, India,  and Maharashtra.   O n m yw a y 22  talk 06:03, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Very less coverage which is independent and significant. It might be the case of toosoon.  QueerEcofeminist🌈  15:49, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  11:39, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Prateek is a notable film director and producer. He can be seen on many notable news websites and he has directed many notable films. Passes WP:FILMMAKER. Social-Informers (talk) 11:55, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. On first glance, it seems that although his films may be notable, he is not. He has a large number of mentions in Indian media, but almost all of the coverage is trivial, and limited to naming him as the maker of a specific film. Fails WP:GNG but there is a chance he could pass WP:FILMMAKER according to the clause "The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews," but I don't think so, because I think this generally refers to a series, but there is nothing to link together his body of work to make it collectively well-known. Chagropango (talk) 15:38, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article does include some coverage by reliable sources. Subject seems just notable enough to keep. Admittedly, I'm inclined to reject any AfD proposed by a confirmed sockpuppet. Doczilla  @SUPERHEROLOGIST 19:44, 23 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.