Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Praxis Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 02:17, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Praxis Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a custom Google search of reliable music sources. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. czar 14:43, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  czar  14:50, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete without prejudice - needs, like, any sources - David Gerard (talk) 10:38, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * weak delete - long history, a couple of marginally notable artists, and no sources found in search.  The "Praxis Records" mentioned in Billboard and some U.S. country-music publications appears to be an unrelated entity.  Notability is questionable at best, but perhaps someone will be able to find some German sources?    78.26   (spin me / revolutions) 14:11, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete at best, still questionable for the needed independent notability which is expected with these subjects, so it's not surprising there's nothing improvable. SwisterTwister   talk  05:34, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Onel 5969  TT me 14:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.