Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pre-Paid Legal


 * This looks like advertising. Delete. Pteron 18:11, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * KEEP I've rewritten the article to make it one about pre-paid legal services in general rather than one company. AndyL 19:14, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Formerly advertising garbage. Now a real article. Keep. -- Cyrius|&#9998 20:21, Apr 19, 2004 (UTC)
 * Excellent. This really was advertising garbage as of just this morning.  Keep. - Lucky 6.9 21:24, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Yes, excellent work AndyL, and well done team. Andrewa 21:47, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. VfD more effective that Cleanup? What's the form ... can the submitter (me) withdraw a VfD where circumstances have improved? --Tagishsimon
 * Unfortunately VfD is normally more effective than cleanup, and far too many people have realised this. "What can't be cured must be endured", as the sanglier doesn't actually say on page one of Asterix and the Black Gold but almost does. But if you have any ideas that will reduce this phenomenom I'm all ears.
 * The form as I understand it is to leave it here for at least 24 hours after consensus to keep has been achieved (and I agree that it has been provided there are no more votes to delete). Then anyone can delist the page, but it's IMO best form for the lister to do it. If you do, send me a note on my talk page, and I'll then archive this discussion to the article talk page and delete the MediaWiki page, which will tidy everything up. That's assuming somebody else on the maintenance crew doesn't get to it first. Andrewa 15:34, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)